any debate on hudud, should not only include pakar undang-undang islam dan alim ulamak, tetapi any artis or politician yang would have been punished severely if hudud had already been implimented. :)
what i'm seeing is folks talking about how barbaric (supposedly) some of the hukuman is and how it seemed tak setimpal with the "crimes" committed.
i don't think that covered all aspects of the law.
i'm no expert. but i can think and sometimes i question things but it doesn't mean i disagree or disrespect anything, especially when it comes to hukum-hakam ni.
it doesn't help la if some believe that since it came from god then that's that. terima dalam terpaksa?
maybe all we need is just a clearer understanding of the whys and the rationale.