Skip to main content

the big debate..

it would be a crime to miss the big debate tonight. hehe. i for one will be watching it. although one can already guess la the points that will come out.

there are some points that need to be clarified. the topic of the debate is clear. hari ini membentuk kerajaan. esok turun harga minyak. what price are we talking about? petrol pumps? international crude oil prices?

can it be done? yes. but can it be done a day after one takes office? probably not. for starters, the transmission mechanism must be in place for any changes to filter down from a government ruling to the dealer at the pump. agreements between dealers and the oil company on who would bear the cost of the reduction. is it just a matter of increasing the government subsidies? or is it an erosion of profit from the oil companies perspective?

would the reduction be permanent? or is it just temporary? until it reaches a point where it is no longer sustainable and then will they just simply increase the price again? if they reduce the price today, and increase it again tomorrow? does that mean that they are still true to their word? because the promises does not say anything about KEEPING THE PRICE LOW.

and then how LOW is LOW? how do you decide?

unless DSAI has a secret formula to some fancy high tech fusion technology, the most likely method to reduce the oil price would definitely have something to do with PETRONAS' profits. so the new government would probably impose a higher dividend payment from petronas, and this amount would be used to offset any price reduction. in essence, they are going to use whatever amount they receive to pay for these subsidies. it's the government's prerogative. the profits they get from PETRONAS can be used to pay for whatever the government decides. they could invest on infrastructure and what not. or they could just use it for subsidies. in essence, PETRONAS would be supporting the other oil companies as well!! because the government still have to compensate the other oil companies for the reduction of their income.

that's where the question lies. if this is the preferred method then, why would the government use our national company's money to pay off other foreign multinationals?

unless the method that they would propose is to just cap the price and tell the oil companies to just sod off and just suck it. force the oil companies to accept the reduction. make it a mandatory requirement. if the oil companies are not willing to accept these terms then they could just sod off and get out of the country. renationalize all oil and gas upstream and downstream assets.

hehe waah. what would be the implication of that?

apart from being shunned by the international community, and possibly being taken to court for various breaches of whatever - it would probably still be okay for us la. we get cheaper oil.

in my opinion, we can try to reduce oil price by going back to basics. we need to manage the demand since we can't really influence the supply of oil. using prices to try to manage demand is one thing, but it doesn't really look into the fundamentals that drives demand up. consider this, people have been complaining about how our public transport system sucks balls. most frustrated people would rather be stuck in massive jams in their own car than be stuck in sardine can packed lrts. if you can persuade the thousands of drivers to use public transport - how much reduction would that make on fuel consumption and usage? or maybe if you improve on the roads to eliminate congestion, folks won't waste fuel stuck in jams.

you can be more firm also. governments can impose demand reduction methods to slowly reduce consumption. you can have driving bans according to number plates. alternate days for odd and even number plates. you can impose a charge to enter city centers. u can implement mandatory park and rides system. u can do a bunch of things. but to ensure the success of these drastic measure, u must provide a viable alternative. hehe i should throw in riding a bicycle in there somewhere la kan just for good measure.

so what can you expect from the debate? would the opposition be sharing their proposal with the government? or would they just tell us that they have the plan but we must vote them first if we want to see it?

i guess we just have to wait and see..



Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Brand new year, same old shit?

2017 is here. After that very eventful 2016 one can't help but hope that the new year brings about more positive things. It doesn't look all that good though.
Will we get an election this year? I'd seriously consider it if I was the pm. I mean yes he has go a lot going for him but what he doesn't have at the moment is a credible United opposition to give him a run for his money. So yeah. Calling for an early election may be something that can be to his favour.
Will stupid acts by stupid people stop making then famous? Nope. Early on we saw a bunch of kids scaling the IPOH sign for shits and giggles. Posted everything on social media. Last I heard they've already come in to give statements to the fuzz. So the moral of the story is if you wanna do stupid things don't blab on social media with your smiling mug there for everyone to see.
Pump prices are up. No point complaining anymore since the price mechanism is partially public so we can pretty much guess th…

What's in it for me.

Looking at how the campaign for the Sarawak state election is going you would think that is a matter of who can promise the most who would probably win it. Difference being one party boasts a track record and the other one, well depends on which other one that is doesn't. 
I especially love it how these promises are all presented as conditional upon winning the election. Doesn't reek of bribery at all eh? Not buying votes. Yeah right. 
You would think that given how Selangor and Penang are run, they would want to see it emulated in Sarawak? I guess loyalty goes a long way over there. 
As it is there are a couple of outstanding issues that Sarawak can use as a bargaining chip in trying to force the federal government to start giving them more.
Oil royalties, more federal projects etc. and what better way to do it than to vote for the opposition? 
If the opposition wins, then Sarawakians can send a message to the federal gov't that hey if you don't give us what we want than t…

Of drivers and motivation.

You often wonder why folks behave the way they do. What drives them and why they behave inexplicably different from what you expect it them. You like to think that there is an element of commonality in human behaviour when it comes to certain things. Things like common sense and decency. Things involving ethics and moral behaviour. 
You would like to think that there is a baseline that people thread on and you can count on them to toe the line. 
You would like that very much. 
But the reality of it all is much different. We are all driven by different things. There's that element of unpredictability in each one of us that allows us to surprise people every now and then. The more we expect people to behave a certain way, the more likely it is for us to be surprised when they actually do the opposite. 
Maybe we shouldn't even bother. Let's just factor in all the uncertainties in life and just focus on what we can control. Yep. Let's just concentrate on our own action and beh…